Conclusion
The
intention of this Village Design Statement is not to recommend that no further
development take place in Lympstone, nor to suggest that any future building
should be in a pastiche style. The status quo is not an option.
However, if
Lympstone is to remain a special place, alterations and new building should
respect its particular character. In the case of old buildings, this means that
the existing proportions and materials should be observed. Lympstone derives
its character from individuality and variety, and new building in the 21st
century should continue this tradition. Stock housing estates by developers are
not appropriate, and nor are architectural details from chain stores that sell
the same bland design all over the country.
There are
many examples of the ways in which modern buildings can respect the character
of older ones, without resorting to feeble imitation. In
Lympstone
would benefit enormously from an equally imaginative response from developers
to the character of the existing village.
It is not within
the remit of this report to make recommendations about social policy. Only a
Village Plan, which would have to be an initiative by the Parish Council, could
do that. But it is worth saying that the obvious and often-suggested need for
affordable housing within Lympstone could fit appropriately into a
village-scape of high density cottages of varying sizes.
The many
people who have contributed to and commented on this survey of Lympstone all
agree that it is a special place. All of them, whether born and bred in the
village, long-time residents or even the sometimes derided newcomers, share a
common interest in making sure that its character is not lost, at a time when
there is great pressure for development.
CCarter